Compare
Tether vs Canny
Canny collects feature requests on voting boards for product and revenue teams. Tether finds the pain behind what customers say, wherever they say it, for founders.
Built for
Solo founders and small teams deciding what to build next.
Product, sales, customer success and marketing teams.
What it does with feedback
Turns every call and conversation into a ranked list of customer pain points, each with the quotes behind it and who said them.
Customers post and vote on feature requests in a portal; Canny ties requests to revenue, shows a roadmap and announces what shipped.
Where feedback comes from
Call transcripts, Email, Forwarded emails and notifications, LinkedIn messages, Text messages, Slack channels, Product Hunt comments, Indie Hackers posts, Replies on X and Bluesky, YouTube comments, and any web page through Tether for Chrome.
Its own portal, plus support and sales tools such as Intercom, Zendesk, Gong, HubSpot and Slack.
In your AI assistant
Built for it. Ask in Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code, Cursor or VS Code over MCP.
Has an MCP server for querying feedback in Claude or ChatGPT.
Ties code to customers
Matches each GitHub pull request to the pain points it addresses and comments with how many customers asked for it.
Integrates with GitHub and Jira to keep request status in sync.
Price
Free during early access.
See canny.io/pricing.
Canny’s column is from its website, checked October 2026. Something out of date? Email hello@usetether.io.
Find out what your customers keep telling you
Free during early access. Sign in with GitHub, Google or your email.
Create your account